Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39508927›Full record

ArticlePlanta2024

Cell cycle time in the root apical meristem of angiosperms and its dependence on holoploid DNA content.

Natalia V Zhukovskaya, Victor B Ivanov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalia V ZhukovskayaK. A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ul. Botanicheskaya 35, Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5283-7043
Victor B IvanovK. A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ul. Botanicheskaya 35, Moscow, Russia. ivanov_vb@mail.ru.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 122042700044-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionIn the angiosperm root apical meristem, the holoploid DNA content is not directly related to cell cycle time. Instead, ploidy, chromosome number, and taxa emerge as key factors that influence this interaction. It is commonly considered that cell cycle time in the angiosperm root apical meristem is directly related to the holoploid DNA content, and this is one of the manifestations of the nucleotypic effect. In this paper, we significantly expanded the previously reported data on cell cycle time using the thymidine method and the rate-of-cell-production method and investigated the nucleotypic effect in different taxonomic groups, in diploids with varying numbers of chromosomes, and in species of different ploidy levels. The nucleotypic effect was most pronounced in diploids with a chromosome number of less than 17, especially in the orders Asparagales and Liliales. In diploids with 17 and a greater number of chromosomes, and in polyploids, the nucleotypic effect was only evident in these two orders and was practically absent in the rest of angiosperms, which have generally lower the holoploid DNA content and average DNA content per chromosome. Overall, our work demonstrates that in angiosperms the relationship between cell cycle time in the root apical meristem and the holoploid DNA content is complex and not homogeneous and it is not directly related to cell cycle time. Instead, ploidy, chromosome number, and taxa emerge as key factors that influence this interaction.

Indexed as

Cell CycleChromosomes, PlantDNA, PlantMagnoliopsidaMeristemDiploidyPlant RootsPloidiesPolyploidyDNA, PlantAngiospermsCell cycle timeCell proliferationHoloploid DNA contentRoot apical meristemRoot developmentRoot growth

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.