ArticlePediatric surgery international2024
Comparison of pain between laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) and open procedure for inguinal hernias in children below 5 years of age.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sequential laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia during NICU/GCU hospitalization in low birth weight infants.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe laparoscopic approach (LA) for repairing inguinal hernias (IH), especially laparoscopic extraperitoneal percutaneous closure (LPEC) has become popular minimally invasive surgical technique. However, invasiveness is difficult to evaluate in children of < 5 years of age, as they cannot adequately express their pain. The current study utilized a pain scoring system compare pain in patients of < 5 years of age who were treated by LA or traditional open approach (OA).
methodsThe records of 74 IH patients of < 5 years of age who underwent surgery in our hospital between January 2022 and July 2023 were reviewed. Revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scores were used to quantitatively evaluate the degree of pain.
resultsForty-seven patients (mean age, 2.85 years) underwent treatment with an OA, and 27 patients (mean age, 2.37 years) underwent treatment with an LA. The FLACC scores in the OA and LA groups were 0.21 and 0.44, respectively. In a subanalysis by age groups, The FLACC scores in the OA and LA groups were 0.09 and 0.5 in patients of < 2 years of age, respectively,
conclusionThe reduced invasiveness of LA relative to OA did not minimize postoperative pain, especially in patients < 2 years of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39508906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.