ArticlePediatric surgery international2024
Assessment of transfer-time and time-to-surgery as risk factors to survival in Gastroschisis (GS) in a LMIC; an eight-year review.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digestive congenital anomalies: a call for equity in global neonatal surgical care.Pediatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe management of Gastroschisis in LMICs continues to be a challenge and is associated with very poor outcomes in contrast with HICs where survival rates near 100%. The purpose of this work is to provide an overview of survival over the past 8 years in a high-flow tertiary centre in Africa. It also investigates the effect of transfer-time and time-to-surgery on outcome.
methodsRetrospective case note review of all GS admissions. The variables assessed were gender, gestational age, weight, type of GS, transfer time, time to surgery and type of surgery. The primary outcome was survival.
resultsA total of 171 GS cases were identified: 148 simple, 23 complex. Seven died before surgery. The median age at surgical intervention was 8.5 h (range, 0-48). Closure options ranged from single-staged (primary fascial, skin, umbilical flap and sutureless closure) or a staged (silo) closure. Overall survival was 34.5%. Cases transferred under 8 h had a 46% survival. Surgery under 12 h of life had highest survival, 45%. Simple GS survived better than complex GS (40% vs 10%). Primary closure had a significantly better survival compared to staged closure (51% vs 18%).
conclusionsTransfer-time < 8 h plays a vital role in survival of GS cases. Surgical intervention within 12 h of birth showed a statistically significant improvement in outcome. Primary closure was associated with better survival rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.