Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39508555›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Precise control of neural activity using dynamically optimized electrical stimulation.

Nishal Pradeepbhai Shah, A J Phillips, Sasidhar Madugula, Amrith Lotlikar, Alex R Gogliettino, Madeline Rose Hays, Lauren Grosberg, Jeff Brown, Aditya Dusi, Pulkit Tandon and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neural population dynamics of direct electrical stimulation of neocortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Restoration of Sight with Electronic Retinal Prostheses.Annual review of vision science · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Nishal Pradeepbhai Shah *Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1275-0381
A J Phillips *Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9109-6551
Sasidhar MadugulaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford, United States.
Amrith LotlikarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, United States.
Alex R GogliettinoHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Madeline Rose HaysHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Lauren GrosbergDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford, United States.
Jeff BrownDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, United States.
Aditya DusiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, United States.
Pulkit TandonDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, United States.
Pawel HottowyAGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Krakow, Poland.
Wladyslaw DabrowskiAGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Krakow, Poland.
Alexander SherSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, Santa Cruz, United States.
Alan M LitkeSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, Santa Cruz, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3973-3642
Subhasish MitraDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, United States.
E J ChichilniskyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5613-0248

Funding

Training Program in Basic NeuroscienceT32MH020016 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Justin L Gardner, Merritt C Maduke · 1997 to 2026
$16.2M
Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY019005 · NEI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI ALBRIGHT, THOMAS D · 2009 to 2018
$7.7M
Unique physiological properties of novel ganglion cell types in primate retinaR01EY029247 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI EDUARDO CHICHILNISKY, Michael B Manookin · 2018 to 2026
$4.7M
Patterned Electrical Stimulation of the Retina for High-Resolution ProsthesesR01EY021271 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI EDUARDO CHICHILNISKY · 2011 to 2026
$4.6M
Bi-directional neural interface for probing parallel visual pathwaysR01EY032900 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHICHILNISKY, EDUARDO, COGAN, STUART F · 2021 to 2024
$2.8M
Relating spontaneous activity to electrical stimulation properties of primate retinal ganglion cellsF30EY030776 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MADUGULA, SASIDHAR · 2019 to 2022
$158k
Probing visual computations and electrical stimulation in the central macaque retina for high fidelity vision restorationF31EY033636 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOGLIETTINO, ALEX RICHARD · 2022 to 2024
$97k
National Science Foundation 1828993National Science Foundation NSF/CRCNSNational Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship 2146755NEI NIH HHS F30 EY030776NEI NIH HHS F30-EY-030776-03NEI NIH HHS F31 EY033636NEI NIH HHS F31-EY-033636NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019005NEI NIH HHS P30-EY019005NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021271NEI NIH HHS R01-EY021271NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029247NEI NIH HHS R01-EY029247NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032900NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020016NIMH NIH HHS T32MH-020016Polish Academy of Sciences DEC-2013/10/M/NZ4/00268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural implants have the potential to restore lost sensory function by electrically evoking the complex naturalistic activity patterns of neural populations. However, it can be difficult to predict and control evoked neural responses to simultaneous multi-electrode stimulation due to nonlinearity of the responses. We present a solution to this problem and demonstrate its utility in the context of a bidirectional retinal implant for restoring vision. A dynamically optimized stimulation approach encodes incoming visual stimuli into a rapid, greedily chosen, temporally dithered and spatially multiplexed sequence of simple stimulation patterns. Stimuli are selected to optimize the reconstruction of the visual stimulus from the evoked responses. Temporal dithering exploits the slow time scales of downstream neural processing, and spatial multiplexing exploits the independence of responses generated by distant electrodes. The approach was evaluated using an experimental laboratory prototype of a retinal implant: large-scale, high-resolution multi-electrode stimulation and recording of macaque and rat retinal ganglion cells ex vivo. The dynamically optimized stimulation approach substantially enhanced performance compared to existing approaches based on static mapping between visual stimulus intensity and current amplitude. The modular framework enabled parallel extensions to naturalistic viewing conditions, incorporation of perceptual similarity measures, and efficient implementation for an implantable device. A direct closed-loop test of the approach supported its potential use in vision restoration.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationRetinal Ganglion CellsAnimalsElectrodes, ImplantedMacacaMacaca mulattaPhotic StimulationRatsVisual Prosthesisbrain–computer interfaceelectrical stimulationlong-evans ratneuroscienceretinarhesus macaquesensory prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID39508555
PMCPMC11542921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.