Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39508450›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2024

Dissecting immunological mechanisms underlying influenza viral nucleoprotein-induced mucosal immunity against diverse viral strains.

Wanyue Zhang, Angela Sloan, Jérémie Prévost, Levi Tamming, Sathya Raman, Annabelle Pfeifle, Caroline Gravel, Wangxue Chen, Anwar M Hashem, Jianguo Wu and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Wanyue ZhangCentre for Biologics Evaluation, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate, HPFB, Health Canada and WHO Collaborating Center for Standardization and Evaluation of Biologicals, Ottawa, Canada.
Angela SloanNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
Jérémie PrévostNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
Levi TammingCentre for Biologics Evaluation, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate, HPFB, Health Canada and WHO Collaborating Center for Standardization and Evaluation of Biologicals, Ottawa, Canada.
Sathya RamanCentre for Biologics Evaluation, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate, HPFB, Health Canada and WHO Collaborating Center for Standardization and Evaluation of Biologicals, Ottawa, Canada.
Annabelle PfeifleCentre for Biologics Evaluation, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate, HPFB, Health Canada and WHO Collaborating Center for Standardization and Evaluation of Biologicals, Ottawa, Canada.
Caroline GravelCentre for Biologics Evaluation, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate, HPFB, Health Canada and WHO Collaborating Center for Standardization and Evaluation of Biologicals, Ottawa, Canada.
Wangxue ChenHuman Health Therapeutics Research Center, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Anwar M HashemVaccines and Immunotherapy Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Jianguo WuCentre for Biologics Evaluation, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate, HPFB, Health Canada and WHO Collaborating Center for Standardization and Evaluation of Biologicals, Ottawa, Canada.
Jingxin CaoNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
Michael J W JohnstonCentre for Biologics Evaluation, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate, HPFB, Health Canada and WHO Collaborating Center for Standardization and Evaluation of Biologicals, Ottawa, Canada.
Lisheng WangDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Simon SauveCentre for Biologics Evaluation, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate, HPFB, Health Canada and WHO Collaborating Center for Standardization and Evaluation of Biologicals, Ottawa, Canada.
Michael Rosu-MylesCentre for Biologics Evaluation, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate, HPFB, Health Canada and WHO Collaborating Center for Standardization and Evaluation of Biologicals, Ottawa, Canada.
Darwyn KobasaNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
David SafronetzNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
Xuguang LiCentre for Biologics Evaluation, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate, HPFB, Health Canada and WHO Collaborating Center for Standardization and Evaluation of Biologicals, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nucleoprotein (NP) of type A influenza virus (IAV) is highly conserved across all virus strains, making it an attractive candidate antigen for universal vaccines. While various studies have explored NP-induced mucosal immunity, here we interrogated the mechanistic differences between intramuscular (IM) and intranasal (IN) delivery of a recombinant adenovirus carrying NP fused with a bifunctional CD40 ligand. Despite being less effective than IM delivery in inducing systemic cellular immune responses and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), IN immunization elicited superior antigen-specific recall humoral and cellular response in the nasal associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) of the upper respiratory tract, the initial site of immune recognition and elimination of inhaled pathogens. IN vaccination also induced significantly stronger pulmonary T cell responses in the lower respiratory tract than IM vaccination, in particular the CD8 T cells. Moreover, blocking lymphocyte circulation abrogated IM but not IN immunization induced protection, illustrating the critical role of local memory immune response upon viral infection. Notably, the CD40-targeted nasal delivery not only improved the magnitude but also the breadth of protection, including against lethal challenge with a newly isolated highly pathogenic avian H5N1 strain. These findings are informative for the design of universal mucosal vaccines, where the predominant mode of protection is independent of neutralizing antibodies.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalImmunity, MucosalInfluenza VaccinesNucleocapsid ProteinsOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsAdenoviridaeAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCD40 LigandCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInjections, IntramuscularMiceAntibodies, ViralCD40 LigandInfluenza VaccinesNP protein, Influenza A virusNucleocapsid ProteinsNucleoproteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsViral Core ProteinsH5N1Influenzaintramuscularintranasalnucleoproteinuniversal vaccine

Identifiers

PMID39508450
PMCPMC11583363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.