ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Quantitative pharmacology of dual-targeted bicistronic CAR-T-cell therapy using multiscale mechanistic modeling.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Specific Determinants of Response to BCMA- and GPRC5D-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A QSP Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Quantitative Characterization of Innate and Adaptive Pharmacology of Allogeneic anti-CD20 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) Vδ1 γδ T cells using Multiscale Mechanistic Modeling.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
- Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for autoimmune diseases: from exploratory clinical trials to quantitative pharmacodynamic modeling development.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Advancing breast cancer treatment through dual targeting CAR T cell therapy.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Quantitative pharmacology of dual-targeted bicistronic CAR-T-cell therapy using multiscale mechanistic modeling.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the initial success of single-targeted chimeric-antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in hematological malignancies, its long-term effectiveness is often hindered by antigen heterogeneity and escape. As a result, there is a growing interest in cell therapies targeting multiple antigens (≥2). However, the dose-exposure-response relationship and specific factors influencing the pharmacology of dual-targeted CAR-T-cell therapy remain unclear. In this study, we have developed a multiscale cellular kinetic-pharmacodynamic (CK-PD) model using case studies from CD19/CD22 and GPRC5D/BCMA autologous CAR-Ts. Initially, an in vitro tumor-killing model characterized the impact of individual binder affinities and their contribution to overall potency across varying (1) effector: target (ET) ratios and (2) tumor-associated antigen (TAA) expressing cell lines. Subsequently, an integrated CK-PD model was developed in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients, which accounted for CAR-T-cell product composition and relative antigen abundance in patients' tumor burden to characterize patient-level multiphasic cellular kinetics using multiple bioanalytical assays (e.g., flow and qPCR-based readouts). Global sensitivity analysis highlighted relative antigen expression, maximum killing rate constant, and CAR-T expansion rate constant as major determinants for observed exposure of dual-targeted CAR-T-cell therapy. This modeling framework could facilitate dose-optimization and construct refinement for dual-targeted bicistronic CAR-T-cell therapies, serving as a valuable tool for both forward and reverse translation in drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.