ArticleRoyal Society open science2024
Information consumption and firm size.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Information consumption and firm size.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social and biological collectives exchange information through internal networks to function. Less studied is the quantity and variety of information transmitted. We characterize the information flow into organizations, primarily business firms. We measure online reading using a large dataset of articles accessed by employees across millions of firms. We measure and relate quantitatively three aspects: reading volume, variety and firm size. We compare volume with size, showing that firm sizes grow sublinearly with reading volume. This is like an economy of scale in information consumption that exaggerates the classic Zipf's law inequality for firm economics. We connect variety and volume to show that reading variety is limited. Firms above a threshold size read repetitively, consistent with the onset of a coordination problem between teams of employees in a simple model. Finally, we relate reading variety to size. The relationship is consistent with large firms that accumulate interests as they grow. We argue that this reflects structural constraints. Taking the scaling relations as a baseline, we show that excess reading is strongly correlated with returns and valuations. The results indicate how information consumption reflects internal structure, beyond individual employees, as is likewise important for collective information processing in other systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.