[Application of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Report Combined With VI-RADS Bi-Parametric and Multi-Parametric Scoring Systems in Bladder Cancer Diagnosis].

Objective: To verify by retrospective analysis the performance of applying dual-parametric (T2 weighted image [T2WI] and diffusion weighted image [DWI]) and multi-parametric (T2WI, DWI, and dynamic contrast enhance [DCE]) evaluation systems of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis of bladder cancer. Methods: The imaging and clinical data of bladder cancer patients who underwent bladder MRI examination in the Department of Urology of our hospital between January 2020 and December 2021 were collected. A total of 215 bladder cancer patients, among whom there were 183 males and 32 females with an average age of (67.60±11.42) years, were included. The bladder cancer diagnosis of all the cases was verified by pathology analysis of tissue samples. Two radiologists, who were double-blinded, scored multiple sequences separately. Then, a comparative analysis was made on the diagnostic performance of dual-parametric and multi-parametric VI-RADS diagnostic scores. The diagnostic test with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and Cohen's Kappa were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and consistency. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the multi-parametric VI-RADS evaluation system by the two radiologists in the overall population were 0.878 (0.830-0.925) and 0.856 (0.805-0.907), while those for the bi-parametric VI-RADS evaluation system were 0.889 (0.844-0.934) and 0.856 (0.805-0.907), showing no statistically significant difference. No significant difference was observed in the subgroup analysis of patients who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Furthermore, the Kappa values for inter-rater agreement between of the two radiologists were 0.694 and 0.546 (with the VI-RADS score≥3 defined as being positive) and 0.693 and 0.712 (with the VI-RADS score≥4 defined as being positive) in multi-parametric and bi-parametric evaluation, respectively (all Conclusion: The bi-parametric VI-RADS scoring system can achieve a diagnostic efficacy comparable to that of the multi-parametric scoring system, offering an alternative to patients who are unable to undergo contrast-enhanced MRI due to allergic reaction to contrasts.