Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39507951›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025

Surgeon perspectives on a virtual reality platform for preoperative planning in complex bone sarcomas.

Rajko S Vucicevic, Justin B Castonguay, Noe Treviño, Mohammed Munim, Sarah C Tepper, Rex Haydon, Terrance D Peabody, Alan Blank, Matthew W Colman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rajko S VucicevicDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Justin B CastonguayDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Noe TreviñoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Mohammed MunimDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Sarah C TepperDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Rex HaydonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Terrance D PeabodyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alan BlankDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Matthew W ColmanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Treatment of primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas typically includes complete surgical resection with or without adjunctive modalities. Despite best efforts, for the most challenging clinical scenarios such as axial or pelvic sarcoma, five-year survival rates are reported to be between 27 and 40 %. Since quality of resection is a key determinant of oncologic outcomes, it is critical to preoperatively plan the surgical approach to improve resection accuracy, ensure sufficient surgical margins, and reduce the risk of local or metastatic recurrence. The computer conversion of 2-dimensional (2D) computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to a three-dimensional (3D) virtual reality (VR) avatar image may allow improved preoperative estimation of tumor size, location, adjacent anatomy, and spatial understanding of the tumor without relying on surgeon experience, memory, and imagination. The purpose of this study is to investigate the utility of a virtual reality platform in preoperative planning and surgical approach in a retrospective cohort of pelvic bone sarcoma cases. Methods: The histopathology database at our institution was queried for all historical cases of bone and soft tissue sarcoma Results: Four cases of failed resection were evaluated by a group of both attending surgeons and a group of trainees composed of both residents and fellows. Tumor borders were clearly delineated in 0 % and 66.6 % cases when evaluating with conventional 2D imaging and VR, respectively. Participants changed adjacent structure involvement grade 22.2 % of the time after assessing involvement grade on the VR technology, with adjacent ligamentous structure grading changed most frequently in 55.5 % of cases. Users reported they would change the surgical approach or margins 44.4 % of the time after reviewing with VR technology. Initial 6 plane resection plans were changed in every user case. Subjective responses indicated that surgeons expressed more confidence in their approach, confidence with obtaining negative margins, and provided more detail regarding structures to be resected in specific planes. Conclusion: Pelvic tumors present unique surgical challenges due to complex 3D anatomy, the proximity of vital structures, consistency of the tumor, and the need to alter patient position during resection procedures. Using examples of failed pelvic bone sarcoma resections, our study found that VR imaging increased understanding of the tumor environment, characteristics, and ability to communicate with patients and colleagues.

Indexed as

Orthopaedic oncologyResectionSarcomaVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39507951
PMCPMC11535880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.