ArticleJPRAS open2024
Evaluating the Efficacy and Complications of the Scapular Osseous Free Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction: Results from a Population-based Cohort.
Article in JPRAS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Complications of Free Flap Reconstruction in Maxillary and Mandibular Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The scapular osseous free flap (SOFF) is being increasingly used for complex head and neck reconstructions. This study examined the surgical outcomes, focusing on post-operative complications and sequelae in patients who underwent SOFF for maxillary and mandibular reconstructions. Material and Methods: This retrospective, observational, population-based study included patients who underwent SOFF reconstruction at a tertiary referral centre, the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden, from November 2016 to March 2023. All patients were followed-up for at least six months after surgery. Results: Forty-two of the 44 consecutive patients (60 % men) consented to the study and were evaluated with a median follow-up time of 49 months (range 8-85 months). The study divided the patients into two groups; maxillary ( Conclusion: The SOFF is an option for complex reconstructions of the maxilla but is associated with a relatively high rate of complications. Methods that can prevent or minimise sequelae, e.g., oronasal fistulas, in future patients are warranted. The SOFF is an excellent alternative for mandibular reconstructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.