Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39507936›Full record

Trial reportOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2024

Clinical benefit of physical rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasty: A pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial (The DRAW1 trial).

T Mark-Christensen, K Thorborg, T Kallemose, T Bandholm

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03750448 (Does Rehabilitation After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Work), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03750448 nacompletednot on this map

Does Rehabilitation After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Work: A Pragmatic, Randomised, Controlled, Superiority Trial (The DRAW1 Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBornholms RegionskommuneRan2019 to 2022Enrolled168ConditionsArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Telerehabilitation, RehabilitationArmsTelerehabilitation, No intervention, Unsupervised rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T Mark-ChristensenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Centre of Health, Regional Municipality of Bornholm, Rønne, Bornholm, Denmark.
K ThorborgSports Orthopaedic Research Center - Copenhagen (SORC-C), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amager-Hvidovre Hospital, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Denmark.
T KallemoseDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
T BandholmDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Comparative effectiveness trials have not shown superiority of one type of physical rehabilitation over another following total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. We therefore ask the fundamental effectiveness question: Does physical rehabilitation "work" better than no physical rehabilitation? Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a 6-week program of physical rehabilitation (home-based telerehabilitation, or home-based rehabilitation) to no physical rehabilitation following THA and TKA. Design: 3-arm,randomized, controlled, superiority trial with blinded outcome assessments. 377 patients (210 THA/167 TKA) were screened for eligibility before the targeted sample size of 168 patients was reached. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline, at the end of intervention (6 weeks), and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)/Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-subscale: function in daily living. Secondary outcomes included: HOOS/KOOS-subscales: pain, symptoms, and quality of life, patient global assessment, analgesics, walking aids, 30-s chair stand test, 4 ​× ​10 ​m fast-paced walk test, exercise adherence, and satisfaction. Results: Comparing physical rehabilitation (home-based telerehabilitation, and home-based rehabilitation) to no physical rehabilitation, the mean group-differences for the primary outcome were 3.3 (95%CI: -1.9 to 8.6; p ​= ​0.10) points at 6 weeks, and 1.9 (95%CI: -3.7 to 7.6; p ​= ​0.25) and 2.6 (95%CI: -4.4 to 9.6; p ​= ​0.23) points at the 3- and 12-months follow-ups, respectively. Conclusion: Physical rehabilitation was not superior to the no physical rehabilitation comparator following THA or TKA in terms of self-reported function or any of the secondary outcomes. Trial registration: NCT03750448 (November 23, 2018), URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03750448.

Indexed as

RehabilitationTelerehabilitationTotal hip arthroplastyTotal joint replacementTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39507936
PMCPMC11539412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.