Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39507931›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2024

Comparison of different concentrations atropine in controlling children and adolescent myopia: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Baizhou Chen, Yao Ni, Jinghan Chen, Shuwen Xing, Zhaotian Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Atropine Eye Drops in Childhood Myopia Control: A Review.International journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Baizhou ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yao NiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jinghan ChenDepartment of Visual Science, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuwen XingState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhaotian ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the myopia control effect of different concentrations atropine in children and adolescent. Methods: Meta-analyses and systematic reviews available in the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from the databases' inception to August 2023 were searched to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of different concentrations' atropine in controlling myopia progression. Overall effects were performed using random-effects model. AMSTAR 2 tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. Prespecified outcomes were weight mean difference (WMD) with 95% credible interval (95% CI) of annual spherical equivalent refraction (SER) changes and annual axial length (AL) changes. Results: 19 systematic reviews/meta-analyses of different atropine concentrations were included in the analysis. 14 studies reported SER changes, and 17 reported AL changes. In terms of the studies' overall methodological quality level (measured using AMSTAR 2), 1 study was rated high, 7 moderate, 7 low, and 4 critically low. The 0.01% atropine was found to have statistically significance (annual SER change WMD 0.27 [95% CI 0.21 - 0.34] D/year; annual AL change WMD -0.09 [95% CI -0.1 to -0.07]) mm/year), 0.05% atropine was preferred considering efficacy and tolerability (annual SER change WMD 0.54 [95% CI 0.49 - 0.58] D/year; annual AL change WMD -0.21 [95% CI -0.12 to -0.02]) mm/year). Conclusions: Different atropine concentrations alleviated children and adolescent myopia progression. However, higher-quality evidence and further investigation are needed to clarify the dose-response relationship, and practical guidelines must be developed to determine myopia control efficacy.

Indexed as

atropineaxial lengthchildrenconcentrationmyopiaspherical equivalent refraction (SER)

Identifiers

PMID39507931
PMCPMC11537912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.