ArticlePolish journal of radiology2024
Comparative efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus B-mode ultrasound in the diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic abscesses.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Washout on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Benign Focal Liver Lesions-A Review on Its Frequency and Possible Causes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in diagnosing and monitoring hepatic abscesses (HA). Material and methods: This retrospective study included 29 patients (9 females, 20 males) with 64 HA. Computed tomography (CT) served as the diagnostic benchmark, compared with CEUS and B-mode ultrasound (B-mode). Two radiologists assessed the presence, size, and characteristics of the HA. Results: The contrast enhancement pattern on CEUS matched post-contrast CT. Lesion size detected by CEUS ranged from 1.16 cm to 15.33 cm (median 5.74 cm). CT classified lesions into four types: I (tumor-like) - 2, II (honeycomb) - 5, III (lacunar) - 23, IV (cystic-like) - 34. CEUS fully agreed with these classifications. B-mode missed two type I lesions. For type III abscesses, agreement with CEUS was perfect (κ = 1, 100%), and moderate with B-mode (κ = 0.50, 79.7%). For type IV abscesses, agreement with CEUS was perfect (κ = 1, 100%), and high with B-mode (κ = 0.88, 93.75%). Pus enhancement remained stable (± 15 dB), while the abscess pouch background varied (± 11 dB to ± 6 dB). The Mann-Whitney Conclusions: CEUS is superior to B-mode for diagnosing and monitoring HA, offering clearer views of the abscess pouch, septa, and liver parenchyma. The purulent part lacks contrast, allowing accurate assessment. CEUS can replace CT for monitoring and aid in patient selection for percutaneous intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.