ArticlePolish journal of radiology2024
Assessment of thyroid nodule risk stratification knowledge and utilization among Polish physicians: a pilot study.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Ultrasonography is the primary diagnostic tool for evaluating thyroid nodules. The Thyroid Imaging Reporting & Data System (TIRADS) aims to standardise assessment and reduce fine-needle aspiration biopsies through risk stratification. This pilot study examined knowledge and utilisation of TIRADS among Polish physicians, their perception of the usefulness of TIRADS application and the extent of knowledge of individual nodule features included. Material and methods: An internet-based questionnaire about TIRADS use in clinical practice was sent out to Polish Ultrasound Society members. Information on the responder's experience with thyroid ultrasound and knowledge and use of TIRADS was assessed and analysed. Results: Out of 159 physicians, 66.6% did not use TIRADS despite 43.4% being aware of its existence. EU-TIRADS was the most commonly adopted classification (50.9%). Participants who adopted TIRADS were younger ( Conclusions: TIRADS utilization among Polish clinicians is limited, despite awareness of the classification's existence. Knowledge of TIRADS components and the purpose of its application among users is satisfactory. Further training and TIRADS adoption should be encouraged, especially in the light of the recent EU-TIRADS-PL guidelines recommended by the Polish Scientific Societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.