ArticleThe Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians2024
Potential Sampling Errors in Stability Studies Due to Dead Volume in Closed System Transfer Devices.
Article in The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Closed system transfer devices (CSTD) help to reduce the exposure of healthcare professionals to hazardous drugs. They may be used in stability studies conducted on anticancer drugs. During a stability study about polyolefin bags of gemcitabine, Tevadaptor® device was suspected of causing a bias in the evaluation of the concentrations of the first aliquots extracted from the bags. Objective: The objectives are to determine whether the use of a CSTD to prepare a drug solution and to withdraw it from a bag can interfere on the measured concentration compared to the expected one and to suggest hypothesis to explain the phenomenon. Method: In the first experiment, three polyolefin bags of gemcitabine (5.4 mg/mL) were prepared under aseptic conditions using the Tevadaptor Luer Lock Adaptor®. The day of preparation, five aliquots of 3.8 ml each were sequentially withdrawn from each polyolefin bag using the same device. After one day, a new aliquot was withdrawn from each bag. In the second experiment, three polyolefin bags of gemcitabine (5.4 mg/ml) were prepared under aseptic conditions using a needle. One aliquot was extracted using a needle after the preparation from each bag, and another aliquot was extracted after one day. The concentrations of all aliquots were measured by liquid chromatography coupled to a photodiode array detector during the same run. Results and discussion: The concentrations of the first aliquots extracted on day zero from the polyolefin bags using the Tevadaptor Luer Lock Adaptor® exhibit an overestimation of 26% ([95%CI: 23%-29%] P<0.001) compared to the others. Overestimation is not found for subsequent aliquots, or while using a needle to bypass the Tevadaptor® device. Conclusion: This case highlights the bias that may arise when using CSTDs in stability studies. They should be used with comprehensive understanding of their technical specifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.