Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39507860›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2024

Is low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction a durable treatment option?-long-term outcomes of a randomized sham-controlled trial.

Moritz Lange, David Charles, Aisha Kazeem, Marieke Jones, Fionna Sun, Soutik Ghosal, Sarah Krzastek, David Rapp, Nicolas Ortiz, Ryan Smith

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04434352 (Low Intensity Shockwave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04434352 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Low Intensity Shockwave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2020 to 2025Enrolled338ConditionsErectile Dysfunction, Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy, Erectile Dysfunction Following Radiation Therapy, Erectile Dysfunction Due to General Medical ConditionArmsStorz Duolith Low-Intensity Shockwave Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Moritz LangeDepartment of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3423-2478
David CharlesDepartment of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8855-3627
Aisha KazeemDepartment of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3589-4721
Marieke JonesDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5045-6725
Fionna SunDepartment of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9895-4196
Soutik GhosalDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-3104
Sarah KrzastekDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3791-0660
David RappDepartment of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8729-5301
Nicolas OrtizDepartment of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4432-4942
Ryan SmithDepartment of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3880-9740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiSWT) is an emerging non-invasive and restorative therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED) with demonstrated efficacy and few adverse events. Although LiSWT has been shown to improve erectile function amongst men with ED, few studies have examined its long-term durability. We present the long-term results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing erectile function after LiSWT. Methods: A total of 30 patients with baseline ED seen at the University of Virginia were randomized to LiSWT or sham treatment. Patients in the sham group crossed over at 1 month and were unblinded. After initial trial completion, patients enrolled in the long-term outcome study were considered one combined cohort. Patients were treated twice weekly for 3 consecutive weeks with a Storz Results: The mean baseline SHIM score was 10.8±0.94. At 12-, 24-, and 36-month assessment following treatment, the mean SHIM scores were 15.6±1.27 (P<0.001), 15.0±1.14 (P<0.001), and 12.2±1.43 (P=0.31). The mean baseline EHS score was 1.87±0.17. At 12-, 24-, and 36-month assessment following treatment, the mean EHSs were 2.70±0.24 (P<0.001), 2.66±0.21 (P<0.001), and 2.29±0.26 (P=0.10). The median [interquartile range (IQR)] EDITS score was 48.9 (22.7, 74.4), indicating moderate satisfaction with LiSWT. There were no adverse events recorded. Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrates sustained long-term improvement in erectile function after LiSWT for a heterogeneous cohort. While limited by population size, the results suggest durable improvement in erectile function for the first 2 years with a peak treatment effect at 1 year. Treatment effect appears to decline between 2 and 3 years. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04434352.

Indexed as

erectile dysfunction (ED)extracorporeal shockwave therapypsychologicalsexual dysfunctionSexual dysfunction, physiologicalurogenital diseases

Identifiers

PMID39507860
PMCPMC11535733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.