ReviewMedical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal2024
Review in Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) leads to impaired vision and potential blindness. Globally, it accounts for approximately 9% of vision loss cases, and a projected 288 million individuals will be affected by 2040. Current treatments have limitations such as variable effectiveness, high costs, and potential side effects. Additionally, atrophic ARMD management remains challenging. As saffron has shown promising neuroprotective and antioxidant effects by potentially delaying disease progression, this study aims to review the mechanistic, pre-clinical, and clinical evidence of the effects, safety, and tolerability of saffron in ARMD treatment. Methods: The Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles was applied in this narrative review. To find relevant literature, the syntax "(saffron OR crocus) AND (retin* OR "geographic atrophy" OR "choroidal neovascular*" OR "macular degeneration")" was searched in PubMed/MEDLINE. Pre-clinical and clinical original investigations of the effects of saffron in ARMD along with the eligible studies cited in their reference lists were identified and included. Results: Saffron and its active compounds, crocin and crocetin, have shown promising results in improving visual function and delaying ARMD progression. Several clinical studies have found that daily supplementation with 20-50 mg of saffron or 5-15 mg of crocin for 3-12 months significantly improved best-corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and retinal function as measured by electroretinogram and microperimetry, with benefits observed in both dry and wet forms of ARMD. The effects were independent of genetic risk factors and maintained during the follow-up periods, suggesting the potential role of saffron as a long-term treatment option. Saffron reduces ARMD progression via anti-angiogenic, neuroprotective, and antioxidant mechanisms. Moreover, saffron is safe and well tolerated. Conclusions: Although further research is needed to confirm long-term safety and efficacy, current evidence supports the use of saffron or crocin supplements as a safe and tolerable adjunct therapy for ARMD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.