ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2024
Sustained Repigmentation in Vitiligo and Leukodermas Using Melanocyte-Keratinocyte Transplantation: 7 Years of Data.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vitiligo-Current Treatment Options and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Emerging cell-based and cell-free therapeutic strategies for vitiligo.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025Review
- Advances in Cell-Mediated Drug Delivery for Dermatologic Diseases: Mechanisms and Current Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Non-Cultured Melanocyte-Keratinocyte Transplantation Combined With NB-UVB Therapy for Facial Depigmentation Induced by Skin Exfoliator: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Injectable crosslinked HA hydrogel: a promising carrier for cell transplantation to treat stable vitiligo.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The autologous non-cultured melanocyte-keratinocyte transplantation procedure (MKTP) has emerged as an effective treatment for various types of vitiligo and leukodermas. However, there is limited data on the long-term outcomes of the MKTP, especially in Thai patients. Objective: To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of the MKTP in patients with vitiligo and other leukodermas. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed data from 23 patients who underwent the MKTP for vitiligo and other leukodermas at the Siriraj MKTP Clinic, Thailand, and had a follow-up period exceeding 12 months. Clinical characteristics and MKTP specifics were evaluated. Repigmentation outcomes were assessed using the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI). Results: Of the 23 patients (24 treated lesions), 78.3% had segmental vitiligo, while the others had nevus depigmentosus, nonsegmental vitiligo, or piebaldism. Most lesions (70.8%) were located on the face. At the 12-month follow-up, repigmentation showed an 80.8% ± 19.3% VASI improvement, which was sustained over 84 months with an 80%-90% VASI improvement. There was no statistically significant difference in repigmentation outcomes between facial and non-facial lesions. Conclusion: The MKTP demonstrated long-term efficacy and safety in treating vitiligo and other leukodermas, with sustained repigmentation over 84 months. These findings support the use of the MKTP as an effective treatment option for patients with refractory vitiligo and leukodermas, particularly within Thai populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.