ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2024
A novel nomogram for predicting the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients following immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment beyond progression: a single center study based on Chinese population.
Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Beyond Progression in Various Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A population-based nomogram for prognostic assessment in advanced lung cancer following progression with immune checkpoint inhibitor.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Establishment of a prognosis-related predictive model for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with macrovascular invasion treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with intensity modulated radiotherapy.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) persists as a dominant cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with a notably rapid escalation in mortality rates. The advent of immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has ushered in a new era in the management of liver cancer, albeit with unresolved challenges in the context of treatment beyond progression (TBP) and stratified prognosis in diverse populations. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel nomogram model to identify factors that predict the benefit of continued immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients following disease progression in clinical practice. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of ICIs in TBP, focusing on the Chinese population with advanced liver cancer. A nomogram was constructed based on four independent risk factors identified through Cox multivariate analysis, aiming to predict patient prognosis post-ICI treatment. The model was validated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and categorized patients into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups, with further validation using calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The low-risk group demonstrated significantly enhanced overall survival (OS) compared to the high-risk group, with the nomogram predictions aligning closely with actual outcomes for 6- and 9-month OS. The model exhibited commendable predictive accuracy, achieving a C-index exceeding 0.7 in both training and validation datasets. The DCA underscored the clinical utility of the nomogram-based prognostic model, further substantiated by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Conclusions: The developed nomogram presents a potentially valuable tool for predicting the prognosis of HCC patients undergoing ICI therapy beyond progression, particularly within the Chinese demographic. However, the study is constrained by its retrospective, single-center nature and necessitates further validation through large-scale, multicenter clinical studies across varied populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.