Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39507680›Full record

ArticleDisability & society2023

Can Universal Basic Income work for disabled people? An examination of existing UK organisational and academic positions.

Elliott Aidan Johnson, Howard Robert Reed, Matthew Thomas Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disability & society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elliott Aidan JohnsonNorthumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0937-6894
Howard Robert ReedNorthumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4577-1178
Matthew Thomas JohnsonNorthumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9987-7050

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universal Basic Income (UBI) has been proposed as a means of addressing a range of issues relating to welfare systems, including by removing disincentives to economic, social and physical activity. However, UK disability organisations and figures have expressed concerns about whether UBI could lead to unintended consequences for people who currently receive support conditional on needs, means and/or behaviour. In this article, we outline prominent positions regarding disabled people in the literature on UBI and welfare reforms. We find that while there are reservations about the intentions and designs of UBI, there are means of securing positive outcomes and collaboration between its supporters and disability organisations. We also attempted a consultation but were unable to obtain a significant response. This was sometimes due to an expressed inability to respond meaningfully. This serves as a call for organisations to engage with UBI as a key issue of interest to disabled people.

Indexed as

conditionalitydisability organisationsdisabled peoplemeans-testinguniversal basic incomewelfare

Identifiers

PMID39507680
PMCPMC11537295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.