Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39507677›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2024

Development and validation of the Fall Risk Assessment Scale for patients in rehabilitation hospitals: A methodological study.

Shoeleh Rahimi, Hamid Reza Khankeh, Abbas Ebadi, Batol Mohammadian, Narges Arsalani, Masoud Fallahi-Khoshknab, Nazila Akbarfahimi, Elham Loni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shoeleh RahimiDepartment of Nursing University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1532-5989
Hamid Reza KhankehHealth in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, Social Health Research Institute University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9725-3554
Abbas EbadiBehavioral Sciences Research Center, Life Style Institute Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-2911-7005
Batol MohammadianDepartment of Operating Room, School of Allied Medical Sciences Gonabad University of Medical Sciences Gonabad Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8296-7589
Narges ArsalaniDepartment of Nursing University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5949-0727
Masoud Fallahi-KhoshknabDepartment of Nursing University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0507-0107
Nazila AkbarfahimiDepartment of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Rofaydeh Rehabilitation Hospital University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5500-8593
Elham LoniClinical Research Development Center of Rofaydeh Rehabilitation Hospital University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-8099-1275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Falling is a serious threat for patient safety in hospitals. This study aimed to identify the risk factors of fall amongst rehabilitation patients and to use them for developing and validating the Persian version of Fall Risk Assessment Scale (FRAS). Methods: The current methodological study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, based on the review of the literature and investigation of the medical records of 251 patients selected via purposive sampling, the risk factors of fall were extracted and the FRAS was developed accordingly. In the second phase, the face and content validities of the designed scale were determined by cognitive interview and Content Validity Index (CVI) and to evaluate the construct validity, known-groups comparison was performed. Its inter-rater reliability was analyzed using the Results: Fall was significantly associated with disease diagnosis, used medications, history of fall, cognitive impairments, and three items of the Functional Independence Measure (toilet transfer, bed transfer, and shoer transfer). The CVI of the scale was 0.94. The risk for falls group had a significantly higher perceived fall risk than the no risk for falls group, thus establishing known-group validity. Its weighted kappa coefficient was >0.85, its sensitivity was 73%, and its specificity was 82%. Conclusion: The valid and reliable FRAS may accurately assess the level of Fall Risk patients in Rehabilitation wards, helping to predict fall during hospitalization. So, enabling the planning and implementation of effective caring interventions.

Indexed as

accidental fallsinpatientspsychometricsrehabilitationrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID39507677
PMCPMC11538047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.