ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Identifying factors that influence the use of pathogen genomics in Australia and New Zealand: a protocol.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing public health infectious disease response through the Australian Pathogen Genomics program (AusPathoGen): evaluation protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pathogen genomics, where whole genome sequencing technologies are used to produce complete genomic sequences of pathogens, is being increasingly used for infectious disease surveillance and outbreak response. Although proof-of-concept studies have highlighted the viability of using pathogen genomics in public health, few studies have investigated how end-users utilize pathogen genomics in public health. We describe a protocol for a study that aims to identify key factors that influence the use of pathogen genomics to inform public health responses against infectious diseases in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: We will use qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), a case-oriented methodology that systematically compares and analyses multiple cases (or 'units of analysis'), to identify multiple pathways leading to the use of pathogen genomics results in public health actions. As part of the process, we will develop a rubric to identify and define the use of pathogen genomics and individual factors affecting this process. Simultaneously, we will identify cases where pathogen genomics has been used in public health across Australia and New Zealand. Data for these cases will be collected from document review of publicly available and confidential documents and semi-structured interviews with technicians and end-users and summarized in a case report. These case reports will form the basis for scoring each case on the extent of the use of pathogen genomics data and the presence or absence of specific factors such as the ease of extracting essential information from pathogen genomics reports and perceptions toward pathogen genomics. Using the scores, cases will be analyzed using QCA techniques to identify pathways leading to the use of pathogen genomics data. These pathways will be interpreted alongside the cases to provide rich explanations of the use of pathogen genomics in public health. Discussion: This study will improve our understanding of the key factors that facilitate or hinder the use of pathogen genomics to inform public health authorities and end-users. These findings may inform ways to enhance the use of pathogen genomics data in public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.