ArticleBiology methods & protocols2024
Development and characterization of human T-cell receptor (TCR) alpha and beta clones' library as biological standards and resources for TCR sequencing and engineering.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Characterization of T-cell receptors (TCRs) repertoire was revolutionized by next-generation sequencing technologies; however, standardization using biological controls to facilitate precision of current alignment and assembly tools remains a challenge. Additionally, availability of TCR libraries for off-the-shelf cloning and engineering TCR-specific T cells is a valuable resource for TCR-based immunotherapies. We established nine human TCR α and β clones that were evaluated using the 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends-like RNA-based TCR sequencing on the Illumina platform. TCR sequences were extracted and aligned using MiXCR, TRUST4, and CATT to validate their sensitivity and specificity and to validate library preparation methods. The correlation between actual and expected TCR ratios within libraries confirmed accuracy of the approach. Our findings established the development of biological standards and library of TCR clones to be leveraged in TCR sequencing and engineering. The remaining human TCR clones' libraries for a more diverse biological control will be generated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.