ArticleEJIFCC2024
An Approach to Include the Cost of Consumables in Biochemistry Analyzer Procurement on the Reagent Rental Model Alleviates Hidden Expenses.
Article in EJIFCC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Activity-Based Costing of COVID-19 RT-PCR Testing in Public Laboratories in Indonesia: Evidence for Tariff Setting.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical biochemistry analyzers are essential for diagnosing and monitoring various diseases and conditions. However, the procurement of these analyzers is often based on the initial purchase cost, which does not reflect the total cost of ownership. Methods: We applied a novel approach to include all hidden costs to run parameters (consumables and accessories) on a cost-per-reportable test (CPRT) basis. Fixed expenses like water purification plant, HIS connectivity, and electricity backup were assumed to be included in the cost per test itself, while the calibration cost was distributed uniformly in the calculation of CPRT itself. This CPRT was taken to compare the financial results of different bids. Results: The cost per reportable test received after applying our novel approach in maintenance-free reagent rental basis bid was 47.4% lower than the previous cost per test for the purchased equipment. Conclusion: This substantial decrease in cost with our novel approach reduced laboratory expenses possible with accurate comparison among analyzers with uniform specifications after eliminating the hidden expenses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39507579PMC11536279What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.