ReviewEJIFCC2024
History, Implementation and Current Use of the IFCC-IUPAC's Nomenclature for Properties and Units (NPU) Terminology in Denmark, Norway and Sweden.
Review in EJIFCC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward Standardization of Laboratory Terminology.EJIFCC · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic exchange of health care data demands code/terminology systems. In the Scandinavian countries, the IFCC-IUPAC's Nomenclature for Properties and Units (NPU) terminology is used for results in biochemistry, pharmacology, and immunology. Implementation, use and administration of NPU has differed between the countries despite similar health care and lab sectors. In Norway and in one Swedish region NPU - with supplementary SNOMED CT codes is also used for reporting results in microbiology. In Denmark and to some extent in Norway and Sweden NPU is also used for ordering tests. In Norway NPU (as part of NLK) has since 2018 been mandatory in requesting governmental reimbursement for laboratory tests. The numbers of national codes vary considerably (DAN: 303, NOR: 1612, SWE: 415). Furthermore, in Denmark >3500 local codes are used for requisition and to communicate more details with the analytical result than the NPU terminology allows. Also, in Norway the NPU codes are by many lab professionals considered insufficient for communicating all relevant information with results. However, the Norwegian reimbursement system has been a strong motivator for implementing international NPU codes. We find it necessary to add information about "how" a measurement is done to the information about "what" is measured in the laboratory report. Until this is settled otherwise, we suggest an increased pragmatism towards producing national codes including method specific information. Furthermore, we recommend that organisations responsible for classifications have heavy professional participation and decision-making competencies in order to lead and guide implementation and optimal use of the classifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39507572PMC11536272What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.