Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39507563›Full record

ArticleJamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa)2024

Public health surveillance perspectives from provincial COVID-19 experiences, South Africa 2021.

Ruvimbo Chingonzoh, Yvonne Gixela, Bontle Motloung, Nosiphiwo Mgobo, Zonwabele Merile, Thomas Dlamini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruvimbo ChingonzohDivision of Public Health Surveillance and Response, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8454-8812
Yvonne GixelaEpidemiology and Research Unit, Eastern Cape Provincial Department of Health, Bhisho, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6603-5499
Bontle MotloungWorld Health Organization, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9228-0139
Nosiphiwo MgoboEpidemiology and Research Unit, Eastern Cape Provincial Department of Health, Bhisho, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0594-6624
Zonwabele MerileEpidemiology and Research Unit, Eastern Cape Provincial Department of Health, Bhisho, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3592-0467
Thomas DlaminiEpidemiology and Research Unit, Eastern Cape Provincial Department of Health, Bhisho, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6599-7882

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous pandemics, recent outbreaks, and imminent public health events are a clarion call for functional public health surveillance systems that timeously detect public health events, guide interventions, and inform public health policy. We reviewed the Eastern Cape Provincial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) surveillance approach to determine best practices and opportunities to strengthen public health surveillance. We conducted a document review of COVID-19 surveillance reports, tools and guidelines prepared between March 2020 and November 2021. Iterative content and thematic analysis were applied to identify strengths and shortcomings of provincial COVID-19 surveillance. Strengths and shortcomings of the provincial COVID-19 surveillance process, and human, technical, and technological resources for surveillance were described. The existence of local surveillance networks, local availability of national-level surveillance guidelines, the ability to describe and track COVID-19 epidemiology, and provincial access to a national, web-based centralised COVID-19 surveillance data system were strengths identified. Shortcomings included poor data quality, data disharmony between sub-national reporting levels, under-resourced surveillance capacity at district level, and suboptimal use of the routine surveillance system for COVID-19 surveillance. The review determined the need for a web-based, integrated surveillance system that was agile in meeting evolving surveillance needs and accessible at all health reporting levels for response and decision-making. Contribution: The review identified opportunities to advance the existing routine public health surveillance system and improve public health surveillance and response. This qualitative review articulates local knowledge that should be translated into strategies and actions to bolster public health preparedness.

Indexed as

COVID-19 surveillanceintegrated surveillancepublic health emergenciespublic health surveillancesub-nationalsurveillance system review

Identifiers

PMID39507563
PMCPMC11538384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.