ArticleCanadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique2024
The role of mental health nursing in pediatric hematology/oncology - Part 3: Evaluating feasibility, acceptability, and appreciation.
Article in Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In February 2022, we introduced the innovative new role of mental health nurse clinician (MHNC) in pediatric hematology/ oncology in a pediatric hospital in Quebec with the aim of better addressing the needs of young cancer patients and their families. In two previous articles, we explained the method used to develop the role, as well as the strategy employed to implement it. Objectives: In this article, we seek to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation strategy by measuring role feasibility. We will also examine role acceptability and appreciation 1 year following implementation. Methodology: We asked three groups of participants (adolescents, parents and care providers) to complete a research questionnaire based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA), with good inter-rater reliability and discriminant validity. The questionnaire, which was made available online, consisted of statements with Likert-scale responses (from 1 to 5), as well as open questions. We performed a standard descriptive analysis and used the responses to the open questions to support or add nuance to the quantitative results. Results: In total, 31 healthcare professionals, 10 adolescent cancer patients and 10 parents of adolescent cancer patients filled out the questionnaire. Between February 2022 and February 2023, the MHNC provided a total of 691 interventions to 112 individuals (patients and parents). Follow-up sessions were offered to 61 individuals, and 99.6% of them accepted. We found a very strong correlation (r = 0.96) between the number of hours worked by the MHNC and the number of interventions provided. The vast majority of participants from all three groups agreed that the role is appropriate, appreciated and necessary, and that it brings much-needed clinical expertise in mental health to the department. Care providers, adolescents, and parents indicated that they would request this service again and would recommend it to others, if it were needed. The results, therefore, demonstrate excellent feasibility and high levels of acceptability and appreciation. Conclusion: Our study shows that the implemented MHNC role helps improve the clinical management of the mental health of adolescents with cancer, as well as their parents. The role brings much-needed expertise in psychiatric nursing care and supports the clinical practice of care providers. Another study will be conducted in the near future to measure the effectiveness of the MHNC's interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.