ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Benign and malignant breast lesions in children and adolescents - diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Single-port laparoscopic-assisted excision of juvenile giant breast lumps: case reports and literature review.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges in Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia (PASH) of the Breast in a 14-Year-Old Girl: A Case-Based Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Osteoprotegerin as a Potential Biomarker for Breast Cancer: A Study of Its Relationship with Bone Health, vitamin D, and Calcium Levels.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Rare Presentation and Diagnostic Challenges of Intraductal Papilloma in an Adolescent: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Ultrasound elastography: advances and challenges in early detection of breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Clinical study of vacuum-assisted excision of deep breast nodules via the retromammary space.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benign and malignant breast lesions in children and adolescents are rare compared to adults. Most tumors are benign. Malignant breast lesions are extremely rare. Fibroadenomas are the most common, accounting for 95% of all lesions. Diagnosis is based on history and physical examination of the breast and armpit. Imaging studies include ultrasound, mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound is the most commonly used imaging test. Other tests are used in cases of diagnostic doubt. Core needle biopsy should be considered for appropriate diagnostic management. Excisional biopsy should be considered for complex clinical conditions and imaging studies. Except in doubtful situations in children and adolescent girls, a conservative approach and observation of the lesions along with periodic ultrasound examination initially every 6-12 months is advisable. Management of malignant breast lesions in children typically involves a multidisciplinary team consisting of pediatric oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, pathologists, and other specialists and depends on the clinical condition of the patient. An important aspect is the experience of the clinician and radiologist in the treatment of breast lesions, as well as increasing patient and family awareness of possible breast lesions and self-examination. This review aims to provide a scoping overview of the available literature on benign and malignant lesions of the breast in pediatric and adolescent populations to assist physicians and surgeons in making decisions regarding the appropriate diagnosis and management of pediatric breast disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.