Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39507468›Full record

ArticleJournal of education & teaching in emergency medicine2024

Going in Blind: A Common Scenario in an Uncommon Situation.

Ethan Hartman, Kimberly Sokol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ethan HartmanKaweah Delta Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Visalia, CA.
Kimberly SokolKaweah Delta Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Visalia, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Audience: Medical students, interns, junior resident physicians, senior resident physicians. Background: Power outages have been increasing in frequency in the past few years, therefore becoming an increased threat to healthcare delivery.1 While most studies related to the effects of power outages are focused on outpatient care, such as acute exacerbations of chronic lung conditions and the lack of chargeable equipment, with the increasing number of power outages, hospitals must be prepared for this situation as well.2,3 Although agencies such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have provided guidelines for the response of hospitals to temporary loss of power,12,13 hospitals generally rely on institutional policies in response to the event of a power outage. Given the relative rarity but increasing frequency of power outages in hospital settings, this medical simulation was created to present a common occurrence in the emergency department (eg, cardiac arrest) in an uncommon setting of a power outage. Simulation has been shown to improve learner self-efficacy, confidence, and leadership skills among resuscitation teams.4,5 The role of simulation also helps learners identify latent safety threats, in this case a power outage.6 The goal of this simulation is to improve the skills of healthcare professionals with regards to managing cardiac arrest and to encourage these practitioners to consider their own hospital guidelines in response to a power outage. Educational Objectives: By the end of this simulation, learners will be able to (1) evaluate and treat a patient experiencing myocardial infarction and subsequent cardiac arrest during a power outage, (2) describe the local protocols for managing patient care during a power outage, (3) demonstrate the ability to coordinate a medical team during a simulated power outage in an emergency department with limited resources, (4) manage a cardiac arrest patient by following Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) protocols for bradycardia and ventricular fibrillation, and (5) justify the urgency of transfer to a certified ST segment elevation myocardial infarction center/cardiac intensive care unit, referencing the recommended 120-minute door-to-balloon time. Educational Methods: This simulation was conducted with a high-fidelity mannequin. A total of six residents of various post-graduate year (PGY) levels participated in the simulated patient encounter as part of the simulation competition at the Western Regional meeting of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Research Methods: This case was assessed for educational content and piloted by emergency medicine attendings from several institutions prior to running the case for the Western Regional meeting. The efficacy of the content was assessed by oral feedback. Results: The case was well-received by both the attending physicians who evaluated the case prior to running the scenario at the Western Regional meeting and the emergency medicine residents who participated in the case at the Western Regional meeting. Discussion: Overall, this simulation was well received by both the learners and the debriefers. General feedback was positive, with the perception of increased confidence among learners and reflection upon individual hospital policy in the event of a power outage. Topics: Simulation, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, power outage.

Identifiers

PMID39507468
PMCPMC11537728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.