Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39507395›Full record

ArticleArchives of physiotherapy

Indoor and outdoor 10-Meter Walk Test and Timed Up and Go in patients after total hip arthroplasty: a reliability and comparative study.

Federico Temporiti, Chiara Casirati, Paola Adamo, Davide De Leo, Giorgia Marino, Guido Grappiolo, Roberto Gatti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physiotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Federico TemporitiPhysiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1771-2365
Chiara CasiratiPhysiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan - Italy.
Paola AdamoPhysiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan - Italy.
Davide De LeoPhysiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7940-7203
Giorgia MarinoPhysiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan - Italy.
Guido GrappioloHip and Knee Orthopaedic Surgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan - Italy.
Roberto GattiPhysiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan - Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and Timed Up and Go (TUG) are valid tools for gait performance and mobility assessment after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The study aimed to assess test-retest reliability of 10MWT and TUG in indoor and outdoor environments in patients in acute phase after THA and compare their indoor vs. outdoor performance during these tests. Methods: Thirty-five inpatients performed 10MWT and TUG in indoor and outdoor settings on the second postoperative day. An additional evaluation session was performed after 1 hour under the supervision of the same operator. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC: 2.1) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC Results: Indoor (ICC: 0.94, MDC Conclusions: Indoor and outdoor 10MWT and TUG are reliable tests in acute phase after THA. Higher gait speed during outdoor 10MWT may depend on test score variability, due to MDs being lower than MDC

Indexed as

Gait performanceHip arthroplastyIndoor settingMobilityOutdoor setting

Identifiers

PMID39507395
PMCPMC11538899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.