ArticleIEEE sensors journal2024
Validating Joint Acoustic Emissions Models as a Generalizable Predictor of Joint Health.
Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A robust and interpretable deep transfer learning framework on knee acoustic emissions for osteoarthritis classification.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Article
- Hybrid Framework for Cartilage Damage Detection from Vibroacoustic Signals Using Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition and CNNs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis: Future and Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Multi-Scale Analysis of Knee Joint Acoustic Signals for Cartilage Degeneration Assessment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Joint acoustic emissions (JAEs) have been used as a non-invasive sensing modality of joint health for different conditions such as acute injuries, osteoarthritis (OA), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recent hardware improvements for sensing JAEs have made at-home sensing to supplement clinical visits a possibility. To complement these advances, models must be improved for JAEs to function as generalizable predictors of joint health. Addressing this need, this work investigates the effects of recording setup, location-specific factors, and participant population on previously validated JAE models. The effect of recording setup is first investigated by testing a model developed previously for a wearable brace to predict erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in participants with RA on benchtop data, resulting in an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of 0.79, 0.73, and 0.81 respectively. Investigating the effects of participant population type and location-specific factors, a feature-based model and a convolutional neural network (CNN) were both trained with healthy and RA data to predict ESR level, and then tested on a new dataset containing healthy, pre-radiographic osteoarthritis (Pre-OA), and OA data. The feature-based model had an AUC of 0.69 and 0.94, a sensitivity of 0.38 and 0.80, and a sensitivity of 1, while the CNN had an AUC of 0.85 and 0.99, a sensitivity of 0.50 and 1, and a specificity of 0.90 for detecting Pre-OA and OA respectively. The ability to generalize models across setup, location, and participant population provides a foundation for using JAEs as a measure of joint health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.