Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39507314›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation for Periprosthetic Infection after Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Madeline J O'Connor, Kristin N Huffman, Kelly Ho, Sammer Marzouk, Rolando J Casas Fuentes, Kenneth L Zhang, Bradley A Melnick, Payton J Sparks, Raiven Harris, Angelica V Bartler and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Madeline J O'ConnorFrom the Department of Surgery/Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Kristin N HuffmanFrom the Department of Surgery/Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Kelly HoFrom the Department of Surgery/Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Sammer MarzoukFrom the Department of Surgery/Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Rolando J Casas FuentesFrom the Department of Surgery/Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Kenneth L ZhangFrom the Department of Surgery/Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Bradley A MelnickFrom the Department of Surgery/Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Payton J SparksFrom the Department of Surgery/Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Raiven HarrisFrom the Department of Surgery/Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Angelica V BartlerFrom the Department of Surgery/Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Ashley CollinsworthHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Solventum, Maplewood, Minn.
Leah GriffinHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Solventum, Maplewood, Minn.
Robert D GalianoFrom the Department of Surgery/Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic infection after breast reconstruction is not uncommon and can result in loss of the implant pocket and negative patient outcomes. Management of these infections typically involves removal of the prosthesis, treatment with antibiotics, and delayed reconstruction upon infection resolution. The impact of adjunctive use of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell (NPWTi-d) on breast pocket salvage rates, time to implant reinsertion, and related outcomes was examined. Methods: A systematic literature search using PubMed, Cochrane, OVID, Scopus, and Embase was conducted to identify peer-reviewed articles written in English and published between January 2004 and April 2023 that examined NPWTi-d use in the breast pocket with a history of periprosthetic infection after breast reconstruction. Results: Of the 1703 publications, 6 studies met inclusion criteria, representing 115 patients and 122 breasts. The overall breast pocket salvage rate with NPWTi-d across studies was approximately 92%. In the 6 studies that included prosthesis type and radiation history, overall salvage rates were 97.8% (45 of 46) for pockets containing implants and 93.8% (15 of 16) for pockets containing tissue expanders. Salvage rates were 85.7% (12 of 14) and 91.7% (53 of 58) for irradiated and nonirradiated breasts, respectively. Mean time to implant reinsertion ranged from 2.3 to 10.3 days. Conclusions: In this review, antibiotic therapy along with adjunctive use of NPWTi-d for periprosthetic infections after breast reconstructions was associated with high rates of breast pocket salvage and reduced time to implant reinsertion. Larger prospective and randomized trials are needed to better understand and optimize the effectiveness of NPWTi-d in this population.

Identifiers

PMID39507314
PMCPMC11537567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.