ArticleJournal of inflammation research2024
High RRM2 Correlates with Mitochondrial and Immune Responses in the Eosinophilic Subtype of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the predominant subtype of RCC, is distinguished by unique biological characteristics and heterogeneity, including eosinophilic and clear subtypes. Notwithstanding progress in therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the prognosis for individuals with metastatic ccRCC remains poor, presumably owing to metabolic alterations leading to mitochondrial dysfunction, which affects treatment response variability. Methods: We analyzed histological and immunohistochemical data from a cohort at Dalian Medical University's First Affiliated Hospital alongside RNA-sequencing transcriptome data from the TCGA database. Histologically, eosinophilic and clear ccRCC subtypes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models for survival analysis and prognosis. Differential gene expression (DEG) analysis and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis were performed to explore transcriptomic differences and relevant pathways. Results: The study discovered substantial histological and molecular differences between the eosinophilic and clear cell subtypes of ccRCC. The eosinophilic subtype linked with frequent high-grade tumors (69.05% eosinophil vs 35.35% clear) and a poorer prognosis (HR=2.659, 95% CI:1.437-4.919, P=0.002). DEG analysis revealed distinct expression patterns among subtypes and identified a risk score signature that remained significant even after adjusting for clinical variables (HR=3.967, 95% CI: 1.665-9.449, P=0.002), showing less favorable survival in the high-risk group (P < 0.0001). RRM2 emerged as the most prognostic gene from this risk score, particularly in the eosinophilic subtype, alongside other clinical variables. By IHC, RRM2 shows high IHC score in eosinophilic compared to clear subtype (P=0.019). In addition, highly expressed RRM2 correlates with poor outcomes and is linked to mitochondrial genes, immunological pathways, and ICIs treatment. Conclusion: These findings show significant differences in prognosis between subtypes. RRM2 was the most prognostic gene from the discovered novel risk score signature associated with subtypes. Future research is essential to validate these insights and their therapeutic implications for ccRCC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.