ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2024
Quantitative characterization of retinal features in translated OCTA.
Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Federated Learning for Multi-Disease Ophthalmic Diagnostics Using OCT Angiography.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- A Future Picture: A Review of Current Generative Adversarial Neural Networks in Vitreoretinal Pathologies and Their Future Potentials.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Localization of Microvascular Changes in Systemic Disease Without Retinopathy Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA).Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Diffusion model based OCT to OCTA translation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the feasibility of quantitative Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) features translated from OCT using generative machine learning (ML) for characterizing vascular changes in retina. A generative adversarial network framework was employed alongside a 2D vascular segmentation and a 2D OCTA image translation model, trained on the OCT-500 public dataset and validated with data from the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) retina clinic. Datasets are categorized by scanning range (Field of view) and disease status. Validation involved quality and quantitative metrics, comparing translated OCTA (TR-OCTA) with ground truth OCTAs (GT-OCTA) to assess the feasibility for objective disease diagnosis. In our study, TR-OCTAs showed high image quality in both 3 and 6 mm datasets (high-resolution and contrast quality, moderate structural similarity compared to GT-OCTAs). Vascular features like tortuosity and vessel perimeter index exhibits more consistent trends compared to density features which are affected by local vascular distortions. For the validation dataset (UIC), the metrics show similar trend with a slightly decreased performance since the model training was blind on UIC data, to evaluate inference performance. Overall, this study presents a promising solution to the limitations of OCTA adoption in clinical practice by using vascular features from TR-OCTA for disease detection. By making detailed vascular imaging more widely accessible and reducing reliance on expensive OCTA equipment, this research has the potential to significantly enhance the diagnostic process for retinal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.