ArticleIEEE sensors journal2023
Classifying Pre-Radiographic Osteoarthritis of the Knee Using Wearable Acoustics Sensing at the Point of Care.
Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A robust and interpretable deep transfer learning framework on knee acoustic emissions for osteoarthritis classification.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Article
- Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis: Future and Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Validating Joint Acoustic Emissions Models as a Generalizable Predictor of Joint Health.IEEE sensors journal · 2024Article
- Correlation between proprioception, functionality, patient-reported knee condition and joint acoustic emissions.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study was undertaken to determine if knee acoustic emissions (KAE) measured at the point of care with a wearable device can classify knees with pre-radiographic osteoarthritis (pre-OA) from healthy knees. We performed a single-center cross-sectional observational study comparing KAE in healthy knees to knees with clinical symptoms compatible with knee OA that did not meet classification criteria for radiographic knee OA. KAE were measured during scripted maneuvers performed in clinic exam rooms or similarly noisy medical center locations in healthy (n=20), pre-OA (n=11), and, for comparison, OA (n=12) knees. Acoustic features were extracted from the KAE and used to train models to classify pre-OA, OA, and control knees with logistic regression. Model performance was measured and optimized with Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation. Regressive sensitivity analysis was performed to combine acoustic information from individual maneuvers to further optimize performance. Test-retest reliability of KAE was measured with intraclass correlation analysis. Classification models trained with KAE were accurate for both pre-OA and OA (94% accurate, 0.96 and 0.99 area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), respectively). Acoustic features selected for use in the optimized models had high test-retest reliability by intrasession and intersession intraclass correlation analysis (mean intraclass correlation coefficient 0.971 +/- 0.08 standard deviation). Analysis of KAE measured in acoustically uncontrolled medical settings using an easily accessible wearable device accurately classified pre-OA knees from healthy control knees in our small cohort. Accessible methods of identifying pre-OA could enable regular joint health monitoring and improve OA treatment and rehabilitation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.