Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39507223›Full record

ArticleAging medicine (Milton (N.S.W))2024

Psychosocial factors associated with physical activity in people with dementia: A pilot cross-sectional study.

Nicolas Farina, Uzma Niazi, Riona Mc Ardle, Johanna Eronen, Ruth Lowry, Sube Banerjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicolas FarinaFaculty of Health University of Plymouth Plymouth UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-2547
Uzma NiaziBrighton and Sussex Medical School Brighton UK.
Riona Mc ArdleTranslational and Clinical Research Institute Newcastle University Newcastle UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7959-3563
Johanna EronenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center University of Jyväskylä Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5641-9156
Ruth LowrySchool of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences University of Essex Colchester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4932-5730
Sube BanerjeeFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8083-7649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To understand how psychosocial factors associated with physical activity differ based on disease severity in people with dementia, and how these factors are associated with physical activity participation. Methods: Eighty-seven people with dementia, alongside their family carer were asked to complete a series of questions related to physical activity participation, including barriers, motivators, and facilitators. Regression models were developed to understand how psychosocial factors were associated with physical activity participation in the cohort. Results: In the final models, only the absence of intrapersonal barriers was associated with overall physical activity and regular moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Feelings of relatedness were associated with regular moderate-to-vigorous physical activity only. Conclusion: Reducing intrapersonal barriers would appear to be a potentially useful strategy to promote physical activity in people with dementia. However, a tailored approach is needed depending on the desired physical activity outcome.

Indexed as

barriersdementiaexercisefacilitatorsmotivatorsphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID39507223
PMCPMC11535167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.