ArticleCureus2024
Radiographic and Functional Outcomes Following Resorbable Screw-Augmented Suture Fixation vs. All-Suture Fixation of Mid-pole Patellar Fractures: A Comparative Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Midpole patellar fractures are traditionally fixed with an "11-8" metal tension band construct. However, this technique is rife with implant-related complications. This study aims to evaluate the radiographic and functional outcomes following "all-suture" fixation of mid-pole patellar fractures as compared to resorbable screw-augmented suture fixation. Methods We retrospectively studied a consecutive series of 18 patients, 9 each with mid-pole patellar fractures treated with all-suture fixation or suture fixation augmented with bioabsorbable cancellous screws in our institution. The hybrid fixation cohort was significantly older (p<0.01). Radiographic and functional outcomes, such as time to union, postoperative range of motion (ROM), and the presence of complications such as fracture displacement were recorded and evaluated. The minimum follow-up was one year. Results All cases achieved radiographic union by 15 weeks postoperatively except one from the hybrid fixation cohort. The average time to radiographic union was comparable (p=0.30). Twenty-two point two percent (22.2%; 2 out of 9) of the cases from each cohort had an increase in the fracture gap (>2 mm) at around four to six weeks postoperatively, for which all except one case from the hybrid fixation cohort achieved union thereafter. One patient from the hybrid fixation cohort had fibrous non-union and further fracture displacement. There was another case of mild fracture gapping and screw breakage on review of postoperative radiographs at three months from the hybrid fixation cohort. These patients recovered without surgical revision or implant removal. Conclusions Both non-metal fixation methods for mid-pole transverse patellar fractures proved to be radiographically and functionally comparable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.