ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024
Navigation of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using electromagnetic versus CT-guided localization (NOVEL): a study protocol for comparing procedural success and complication rates in a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority phase III trial.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The unified front: a multidisciplinary approach in the Era of uniportal thoracic surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Erratum: Navigation of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using electromagnetic versus CT-guided localization (NOVEL): a study protocol for comparing procedural success and complication rates in a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority phase III trial.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rise of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has increased the detection of small pulmonary nodules, demanding more effective localization techniques for their resection. Minimally invasive resection utilizing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a critical method for treating these nodules. However, traditional computed tomography (CT)-guided localization has limitations such as invasiveness and patient discomfort. The current gap in knowledge relates to the potential advantages of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) in reducing complications and improving procedural efficiency. The NOVEL trial evaluates the non-inferiority of ENB-guided labeling against CT-guided puncture for lung nodule localization. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority phase III trial includes 156 participants across four Chinese hospitals, randomized to undergo either ENB-guided or CT-guided localization prior to VATS sub-lobar resection. Randomization is performed using sealed opaque envelopes to ensure allocation concealment. Primary outcomes are the procedural success rates and complication rates of both techniques, with secondary outcomes including procedure times and lesion margins. Discussion: The NOVEL trial aims to provide a detailed comparison of ENB-guided versus CT-guided localization for small pulmonary nodules. Establishing the safety and efficacy of the ENB method could significantly influence clinical practices and improve patient outcomes. Trial Registration: This trial was registered with the Medical Research Registration Platform (https://www.medicalresearch.org.cn), registration number MR-31-24-018575.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.