ReviewHeliyon2024
Detrital and authigenic clay minerals in shales: A review on their identification and applications.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Dolomitic Microfossil Preservation in a Cryogenian Microbial Reef, Arkaroola (South Australia).GeobiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clay minerals are widely distributed and are important components in sedimentary rocks. The identification and quantification of detrital and authigenic clay minerals have been hot topics recently due to the needs of petroleum geology, paleoclimate, and sedimentary history research. Detrital clay minerals exhibit the phenomenon of discrete grain boundaries, while authigenic clay minerals have various specific particle shapes. The differences in crystal structure of different clay mineral origins are reflected in the polytype character of clay minerals, especially for illite and chlorite. Different origins of clay minerals inherently have different chemical characteristics. Instead of focusing only on conventional techniques (scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and geochemical analysis), here we review established approaches and introduce emerging analytical techniques (automated mineralogy techniques and artificial intelligence techniques) that can complement current methods. In addition, the applications of these techniques in illite age analysis, paleoclimate reconstruction, and reservoir properties are discussed. Further, different state-of-the-art techniques for clay mineral identification and quantification (e.g., scanning electron microscopy for specific petrographic characterization, X-ray diffraction for bulk crystal structure identification, etc.) are discussed. We propose that combining individual and bulk techniques obtained at multiple scales can provide novel insights for deciphering various clay mineral origins. Understanding the characteristics of clay minerals from different origins is of great importance to scientific issues such as shale oil and gas exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.