ArticleHeliyon2024
Assessing the effectiveness of Renzhu Jianwei Granula in managing precancerous lesions of gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advances in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion with traditional Chinese medicine.International ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Renzhu Jianwei Granula (RJG) is a traditional Chinese medicine compound initially formulated to address precancerous lesions for gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to assess RJG's efficacy in treating precancerous lesions of gastric cancer through a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Methods: Two authors separately conducted an exhaustive search across three databases (PubMed, CNKI and Wanfang) without imposing any restrictions on publication year or language. Eligible studies, spanning from the inception of databases to July 18th, 2024, were included. Valid data were summarized and those with a group size of 3 or more were preserved. R software and Cochrane collaboration tools were employed for sensitivity analysis and assessing the quality of the included studies. The data from selected studies were transformed into risk ratios (RRs) and subjected to meta-analysis. This study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO. Results: Data from 9 studies encompassing 912 participants revealed that the RJG group exhibited superior clinical efficacy compared to the control group, with an RR of 0.36 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.25 to 0.52). RJG demonstrated enhanced efficacy over the control group in both comprehensive efficacy (RR: 0.42, 95 % CI: 0.31 to 0.55) and gastroscopy efficacy (RR: 0.56, 95 % CI: 0.46 to 0.69). Moreover, significant improvements in pathological features such as atrophy (RR: 0.58, 95 % CI: 0.45 to 0.73), dysplasia (RR: 0.41, 95 % CI: 0.27 to 0.61), and intestinal metaplasia (RR: 0.54, 95 % CI: 0.43 to 0.69) in precancerous lesions of gastric cancer were observed following RJG administration. Conclusion: This study's synthesized data provide compelling evidence of RJG's substantial therapeutic impact in ameliorating symptoms associated with precancerous lesions of gastric cancer. Trial registration number: The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024572606).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.