ArticleHeliyon2024
Statistical models and implant customization in hip arthroplasty: Seeking patient satisfaction through design.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-reported outcome measure comparison of two cemented primary total hip arthroplasty implant combinations for osteoarthritis: a regional New Zealand study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Observational
- Temporal Patterns and Treatment Associations in Complications Following Hip Arthroplasty.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study conducts a systematic literature review to explore the role of statistical models and methods in the design of orthopedic implants, with a specific focus on hip arthroplasty. Through a comprehensive analysis of the scientific literature, it aims to understand the relevance and applicability of these models in implant development and research trends in the field of design. Methods: Data analysis and co-occurrence mapping techniques were employed to investigate the statistical models used as predictors of satisfaction in hip arthroplasty and in implant design. This approach facilitated a detailed and objective assessment of existing literature, revealing key trends and identifying gaps in current knowledge. Key findings: The review's findings underscore a burgeoning interest in implant customization, with a significant emphasis on leveraging statistical techniques for optimal design. The logistic model methodology was applied to analyze a survey of hip surgery specialists, revealing that the physician's age does not influence the decision to use a customized implant. Furthermore, the review highlighted a knowledge gap at the intersection of statistics and design discipline concerning implant customization. Significance: Despite the recognized importance of customization in implant design, there remains a dearth of contributions from the design discipline perspective in the existing literature, indicating substantial room for improvement and the need for interdisciplinary integration. Conclusion: The integration of statistical methods in implant design is crucial, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary approaches and customization to enhance patient satisfaction. This study provides a foundation for future research that could transform the field of hip arthroplasty through more personalized and effective solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.