Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39506879›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2024

Management of critically ill patients in austere environments: good clinical practice by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).

Mattia Bixio, Luca Carenzo, Giuseppe Accurso, Roberto Balagna, Simone Bazurro, Giovanni Chiarini, Andrea Cortegiani, Loredana Faraldi, Costantino Fontana, Emilio Giannarzia and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Helicopter emergency medical services for interfacility transfers: an Italian expert consensus.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mattia Bixio *UO Anestesia E Rianimazione, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Luca Carenzo *Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Milan, Rozzano, 20089, Italy. luca.carenzo@hunimed.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4646-2660
Giuseppe AccursoUOC Anestesia Rianimazione E Terapia Intensiva, AOU Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy.
Roberto BalagnaAnestesia e Rianimazione 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute, Torino, Italy.
Simone BazurroU.O. Anestesia E Rianimazione, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy.
Giovanni ChiariniAnestesia E Rianimazione, Spedali Civili Di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Andrea CortegianiUOC Anestesia Rianimazione E Terapia Intensiva, AOU Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy.
Loredana FaraldiServizio Anestesia E Rianimazione 1, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Costantino FontanaAnestesia E Terapia Intensiva, Policlinico Militare, Rome, Italy.
Emilio GiannarziaCentro Ospedaliero Militare, Marina Militare, Taranto, Italy.
Antonino GiarratanoUOC Anestesia Rianimazione E Terapia Intensiva, AOU Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy.
Enrico MolinerisAnestesia E Rianimazione, Cuneo, ASL CN1, Italy.
Santi Maurizio RaineriUOC Anestesia Rianimazione E Terapia Intensiva, AOU Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy.
Paolo MarinU.O. Anestesia E Rianimazione, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) has developed a good clinical practice to address the challenges of treating critically ill patients in resource-limited austere environments, exacerbated by recent pandemics, natural disasters, and conflicts. The methodological approach was based on a literature review and a modified Delphi method, which involved blind voting and consensus evaluation using a Likert scale. This process was conducted over two rounds of online voting. The document covers six critical topics: the overall impact of austere conditions on critical care, airway management, analgesia, bleeding control, vascular access, and medical devices and equipment. In these settings, it is vital to apply basic care techniques flexibly, focusing on immediate bleeding control, airway management, and hypothermia treatment to reduce mortality. For airway management, rapid sequence intubation with ketamine for sedation and muscle relaxation is suggested. Effective pain management involves a multimodal approach, including patient-controlled analgesia by quickly acting safe drugs, with an emphasis on ethical palliative care when other options are unavailable. Regarding hemorrhage, military-derived protocols like Tactical Combat Casualty Care significantly reduced mortality and influenced the development of civilian bleeding control devices. Establishing venous access is crucial, with intraosseous access as a swift option and central venous access for complex cases, ensuring aseptic conditions. Lastly, selecting medical equipment that matches the specific logistical and medical needs is essential, maintaining monitoring standards and considering advanced diagnostic tools like point-of-care ultrasounds. Finally, effective communication tools for coordination and telemedicine are also vital.

Indexed as

Airway managementAnalgesiaAnesthesiaAustereBleeding controlCritical careCritically ill patientHostileMedical devices and equipmentSIAARTIVascular access

Identifiers

PMID39506879
PMCPMC11542215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.