Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39506878›Full record

Observational studyTrials2024

What motivates SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trial participants? A pre- and post-participation survey study.

Olivia A C Lamers, Meta Roestenberg, Martine C de Vries, Marie-Astrid Hoogerwerf

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olivia A C LamersCenter for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Meta RoestenbergCenter for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Martine C de VriesMedical Ethics and Health Law, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333ZA, The Netherlands.
Marie-Astrid HoogerwerfCenter for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. m.hoogerwerf@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3088-3380

Funding

H2020 European Research Council St grant 101075876ZonMw Vidi Grant 09150172010035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScientific advancement, including the testing and licensing of new drugs, relies heavily on clinical trials with healthy individuals. The motivations of clinical trial participants have been discussed intensively, as some worry that financial compensation may distract from the intrinsic risk of clinical research. Herein, we investigated the motivations and decisional factors influencing SARS-CoV-2 clinical trial participants. Moreover, since most surveys are administered after clinical trial participation, we were interested in whether the results were tainted by recall bias.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional observational study. Participants were administered a survey on two occasions, once before and once after participation in a clinical trial. The primary outcomes were the motivations and decisional factors of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trial participants and the difference between the surveys collected before and after clinical trial participation.

resultsThe survey response rate was 149/200 (75%). SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trial participants were mostly motivated by the desire to contribute to science and help others. Answers collected before and after the trial were not statistically different, indicating the absence of recall bias.

conclusionThe decision-making process of clinical trial participants is complex and multi-faceted. Previous studies have shown that clinical trial participants have mixed motivations but never to the extent reported in the current survey. Here, we present a theoretical framework that attempts to explain how different motivational factors may contribute to decision forming.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesMotivationAdultAgedClinical Trials as TopicCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedResearch SubjectsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID39506878
PMCPMC11539315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.