ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2024
Development and validation of the prediction score for augmented renal clearance in critically Ill Japanese adults.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmented renal clearance: from pathophysiological mechanisms to clinical implications and research perspectives.Renal failure · 2026Review
- Sepsis-Specific Risk Factors for Augmented Renal Clearance (ARC) and the Effect of Inflammation on Duration of ARC in Patients with Sepsis: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The long walk to a short half-life: the discovery of augmented renal clearance and its impact on antibiotic dosing.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAugmented renal clearance (ARC) decreases the therapeutic concentration of drugs excreted by the kidneys in critically ill patients. Several ARC prediction models have been developed and validated; however, their usefulness in Japan has not been comprehensively investigated. Thus, we developed a unique ARC prediction model for a Japanese mixed intensive care unit (ICU) population and compared it with existing models.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled a mixed ICU population in Japan from January 2019 and June 2022. The primary outcome was the development and validation of a model to predict ARC onset based on baseline information at ICU admission. Patients admitted until May 2021 were included in the training set, and external validation was performed on patients admitted thereafter. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to develop an integer-based predictive scoring system for ARC. The new model (the JPNARC score) was externally validated along with the ARC and Augmented Renal Clearance in Trauma Intensive Care (ARCTIC) scores.
resultsA total of 2,592 critically ill patients were enrolled initially, with 651 patients finally included after excluding 1,941 patients. The training and validation datasets comprised 456 and 195 patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis was performed to develop the JPNARC score, which incorporated age, sex, serum creatinine, and diagnosis upon ICU admission (trauma or central nervous system disease). The JPNARC score had a larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve than the ARC and ARCTIC scores in the validation dataset (0.832, 0.633, and 0.740, respectively).
conclusionsAn integer-based scoring system was developed to predict ARC onset in a critically ill Japanese population and showed high predictive performance. New models designed to predict the often-unrecognized ARC phenomenon may aid in the decision-making process for upward drug dosage modifications, especially in resource- and labor-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.