ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
A novel personalized homogenous finite element model to predict the pull-out strength of cancellous bone screws.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Finite element analysis of the pedicle screw in lumbar transpedicular dynamic stabilization that penetrates the lateral cortex of the vertebral pedicle.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOrthopedic surgeries often involve the insertion of bone screws for various fixation systems. The risk of postoperative screw loosening is usually assessed through experimental or finite element (FE) evaluations of the screw pull-out strength. FE simulations are based on either personalized complex but accurate heterogeneous modeling or non-personalized simple but relatively less accurate homogeneous modeling. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel personalized computed tomography (CT)-based homogeneous FE simulation approach to predict the pull-out force of cancellous bone screws.
methodsTwenty FE simulations of L1-L5 vertebral screw pull-out tests were conducted, i.e., 10 heterogeneous and 10 homogenous models. Screws were inserted into the lower-middle region of vertebrae. In our novel homogeneous model, the region around approximately twice the diameter of the screw was used as a bone material reference volume. Subsequently, the overall material property of this region was homogeneously attributed to the entire vertebra, and pull-out simulations were conducted.
resultsThe mean error of the predicted pull-out forces by our novel homogenous simulations was ~ 7.9% with respect to our heterogeneous model. When solely the cancellous bone was involved during the pull-out process (i.e., for L1, L2, and L3 vertebral bodies whose cortical bone in the inferior region is thin), the novel homogenous model yielded small mean error of < 6.0%. This error, however, increased to ~ 11% when the screw got involved to the cortical bone (for L4 and L5 vertebrae whose cortical bone in the inferior region is thick).
conclusionThe proposed personalized CT-based homogenous model was highly accurate in estimating the pull-out force especially when only the cancellous bone was involved with the screw.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.