ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Translation, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Activity Patterns Scale (APS) in musculoskeletal pain: a methodological study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social and Societal Factors Interact with Psychological Factors to Shape Pain Outcomes in a Community Sample with Chronic Pain: A Network Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of a German version of the Activity Patterns Scale (APS-GE) in a large sample of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In musculoskeletal pain (MSP), pain duration, disability, and mental health relate to how a person engages in daily activities. The self-reporting questionnaire Activity Patterns Scale (APS) assesses these activity patterns and their subscales: Pacing (Pacing to increase activity levels,Pacing to conserve energy for valued activities,Pacing to reduce pain); Avoidance (Pain avoidance,Activity avoidance); Pacing (Excessive persistence, Task-contingent persistence, Pain-contingent persistence). This investigation translated the APS into German and estimated its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity. The APS translation was conducted following international guidelines for the transcultural adaptation of self-reported measures. For the construct validity, the Avoidance Endurance Fast-Screening (AE-FS), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), and Coping Strategies Questionnaires (CSQ) scales were employed. Sixty-five participants with MSP contributed to a baseline survey with a follow-up at two weeks. The German version of the APS subscales demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.670-0.89) and satisfactory test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.72-0.82); only Task-contingent persistence revealed a poor result. Construct validity was supported by significant correlations between APS subscales (pacing, avoidance, persistence) with related measures, including the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (0.27 to 0.40; -0.50 to 0.55; 0.27 to 0.50), the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (0.28 to 0.47; 0.36 to 0.37; 0.38), and Avoidance-Endurance Fast Screening Pain Persistence Scale (none; none; 0.40). The findings demonstrate high construct validity by the substantial correlations in the predicted directions for the APS subscales and their corresponding questionnaires. The German version of the APS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing activity pattern subscales in individuals with MSP. This distinction could refine research and customize treatment instructions to regulate people's activity in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.