Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39506732›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Medical students' leadership competence in health care: development of a self-assessment scale.

Barbara Ogurek, Sigrid Harendza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Barbara OgurekAcademy for Training and Career, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sigrid HarendzaIII. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. harendza@uke.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical leadership plays an increasing role already in early career stages. Undergraduate medical students in the transition to postgraduate education feel not well prepared for their leadership roles. While leadership curricula have been developed, instruments for students' self-assessment of leadership competences as part of their professional development are still missing. The aim of our study was to develop a self-assessment scale for undergraduate medical students' leadership competences.

methodsThe medical leadership competence scale (MeLeCoS) for undergraduate medical students was developed in twelve steps. For item generation, we employed the Medical Leadership Competence Framework (MLCF), which is also used as a framework for many leadership curricula and includes five leadership domains for three fields of education: undergraduate education, postgraduate education, and continuing practice. In a pretest, 67 items were tested with n = 88 undergraduate medical students. For content validation we performed group discussions with a total of 17 students. After item reduction a test-version with 45 items and a 5-point Likert scale (1: 'never', 2: 'rarely', 3: 'sometimes', 4: 'often', 5: 'always') was used in a test-sample of final-year students (n = 129). Descriptive statistics and factor analyses were performed.

resultsThe final version of the MeLeCoS includes 37 items and the scale's Cronbach's alpha was 0.87. Six factors could be identified and two of them, respectively, represent leadership aspects from the following three areas: (1) the medical students themselves, (2) the interrelation of the medical students with a healthcare organisation regarding general management and improvement, and (3) general leadership aspects of medical students within undergraduate medical studies and the healthcare system. The overall mean of the MeLeCoS was 3.50 ± 0.39. Factor 2 ('Demonstrating responsible behaviour and shaping relations') reached the highest mean (4,36 ± 0.37) and factor 5 ('Promoting improvement and innovation in undergraduate medical education' the lowest (1.91 ± 0.87).

conclusionsThe medical leadership competence self-assessment scale (MeLeCoS) is a reliable instrument for undergraduate medical students' self-assessment of leadership competence with good content validity. It could be used for students' self-reflection on leadership competences in addition to rater-based assessments in leadership curricula and for longitudinal development of students' professional identity.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateLeadershipSelf-AssessmentStudents, MedicalAdultClinical CompetenceCurriculumEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleProfessional CompetenceSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCompetencesLeadershipMedical Leadership Competence Framework (MLCF)Medical studentsProfessional identitySelf-assessmentUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID39506732
PMCPMC11542227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.