SynthesisBMC pediatrics2024
The effect of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic supplements on anthropometric measures and respiratory infections in malnourished children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutraceutical Interventions in Stunting: Advances, Challenges, and Prospects.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- The interplay between malnutrition, persistent diarrhea, lactose intolerance, and food associated gut dysbiosis in children; a comprehensive review.BMC pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalnutrition remains a significant concern in many societies. This study systematically reviewed the effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on anthropometric measures in malnourished children, focusing on changes in weight, height, and respiratory infections (primary outcomes), and head circumference, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and body mass index (BMI) as secondary outcomes.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis involved searching various databases in both Persian and English, including Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and PubMed up to October 5, 2024. Non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were excluded. The Cochrane Handbook Risk of Bias Version 2 tool was used to assess risk of bias, and RevMan 5.3 software was employed for analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the type of supplement received. Meta-regression was applied to identify factors influencing results, and the GRADE approach was used to evaluate evidence certainty.
resultsTwelve studies with a total of 3,086 children (aged up to 6 years, equally distributed between boys and girls) were included. All children were malnourished without underlying illnesses. Limitations of the study included variations in intervention type, dose, duration, and timing of outcome measurement. Meta-analysis revealed that probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics may increase weight (6 trials, mean difference: 0.33 kg, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.50, low certainty of evidence), while probiotics and synbiotics may increase height compared to control groups (5 trials, mean difference: 0.44 cm, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.85, low certainty of evidence). However, probiotics and synbiotics did not show a statistically significant effect on lower respiratory tract infections (5 trials, risk ratio: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.04, moderate certainty of evidence). Meta-regression indicated that intervention type, sample size, and follow-up duration were not significant moderators for outcomes related to weight, height, or respiratory infections.
conclusionThe current evidence suggests that probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics supplements may help manage malnutrition-related outcomes in malnourished children, but further research with stronger study designs is needed to confirm these findings due to the low certainty of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.