Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39506681›Full record

SynthesisBMC ecology and evolution2024

A systematic review of poeciliid fish invasions in Africa.

Joshua Pritchard Cairns, Pedro Henrique Negreiros de Bragança, Josie South

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua Pritchard CairnsWater@Leeds, School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Pedro Henrique Negreiros de BragançaSouth African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Private Bag 1015, Makhanda, Eastern Cape, 6140, South Africa.
Josie SouthWater@Leeds, School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. j.south@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

Mohamed Bin Zayed Fund 202522474UK Research and Innovation MR/X035662/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis review compiles and synthesises the existing information concerning non-native poeciliid introductions to Africa. The recent upsurge in research on invasive poeciliids has revealed their widespread occurrence in Africa.

resultsWithin the 87 relevant articles, 74% reported on the presence of Gambusia spp., 33% on P. reticulata, 19% on X. hellerii, 11% on X. maculatus, and 5% on other ornamental poeciliids. Overall, poeciliids have been documented as introduced to 25 different countries in Africa. With Gambusia spp. being introduced to 16 countries and P. reticulata to 19 countries. Our results are representative of the current state of research on invasive poeciliids in Africa. There was a concentration of studies in South Africa, with limited research elsewhere. Current distribution data is relatively patchy, although widespread surveys of multiple river systems in Morocco and South Africa, confirmed widespread and abundant established poeciliid populations. The ecological impacts of invasive poeciliids in Africa remain understudied but evidence indicates deleterious effects on native fish, invertebrates, and amphibians, many of which are critically endangered or endemic.

conclusionCurrent research is limited in reporting from certain countries and ecological impacts. An increased effort to monitor species composition in vulnerable waterbodies, especially in the many African countries where invasive poeciliids are reported, should be completed to reveal further established populations. Future research should prioritise quantifying the ecological impacts of invasive poeciliids in the field and identifying both vulnerable and resistant native ecosystems to guide future management decisions.

Indexed as

CyprinodontiformesIntroduced SpeciesAfricaAnimalsEcosystemAquariumBiocontrolEcological impactGambusiaIntroduction pathwayInvasive speciesOrnamental trade

Identifiers

PMID39506681
PMCPMC11539733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.