Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39506679›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

Prediction of antibody-antigen interaction based on backbone aware with invariant point attention.

Miao Gu, Weiyang Yang, Min Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miao GuDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Weiyang YangDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Min LiuDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. lium@tsinghua.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62173204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibodies play a crucial role in disease treatment, leveraging their ability to selectively interact with the specific antigen. However, screening antibody gene sequences for target antigens via biological experiments is extremely time-consuming and labor-intensive. Several computational methods have been developed to predict antibody-antigen interaction while suffering from the lack of characterizing the underlying structure of the antibody.

resultsBeneficial from the recent breakthroughs in deep learning for antibody structure prediction, we propose a novel neural network architecture to predict antibody-antigen interaction. We first introduce AbAgIPA: an antibody structure prediction network to obtain the antibody backbone structure, where the structural features of antibodies and antigens are encoded into representation vectors according to the amino acid physicochemical features and Invariant Point Attention (IPA) computation methods. Finally, the antibody-antigen interaction is predicted by global max pooling, feature concatenation, and a fully connected layer. We evaluated our method on antigen diversity and antigen-specific antibody-antigen interaction datasets. Additionally, our model exhibits a commendable level of interpretability, essential for understanding underlying interaction mechanisms.

conclusionsQuantitative experimental results demonstrate that the new neural network architecture significantly outperforms the best sequence-based methods as well as the methods based on residue contact maps and graph convolution networks (GCNs). The source code is freely available on GitHub at https://github.com/gmthu66/AbAgIPA .

Indexed as

AntibodiesAntigensComputational BiologyNeural Networks, ComputerDeep LearningHumansAntibodiesAntigensAntibody-antigen interactionAntibody structure predictionInvariant point attention

Identifiers

PMID39506679
PMCPMC11542381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.